Saturday November 21, 2009  
  diet_images.jpg  

 


Gift Certificates

 
 


Free Telephone Consultation

 
 
Search BecomeHealthyNow.com


 

 
   
   
  I had acid reflux so bad for a year that my esophagus stayed inflamed, I was given things by the doctors and told to raise the head of my bed as I would inhale the acid in my sleep and wake up choking! I got tested with the Symptom Survey Analysis, started taking the Standard Process supplements.....
Read more....

One evening after eating pizza, I had terrible indigestion and a lot of pain in my upper right back. I had this before and after a previous ultrasound, knew I had several gallstones, so I was sure it was my gallbladder acting up again. I figured I had overdone it, so I was careful with what I ate, but a dull pain stayed with me for five more days. I thought it was finally better, but only one day went by without pain....
Read more....
 
   
   
   
     
   
Poll 9: What is the primary reason you visited a doctor this year?
To get a physical
The flu
Headaches
Heart condition
Respiratory condition
Digestive problem
Back pain or musculoskeletal problem
Male related problem
Female related problem
Worried that I might have had a serious health problem
Other (Specify)
Any Comments?




     
   
  We'd love to know who you are and what you think. Please fill out a survey.  
     
   
  Sign upfor our free email newsletter. Delivered to your inbox.  
     
   
  Read the latest health news here. Updated regularly.  
   
 

 

Diabetes / Study: Diabetes Pill Can Double Risk of Death, Heart Attack, Stroke

POST FIRST COMMENT!
Page: 1


(AP) - A new diabetes pill that appeared headed for federal approval can double the risk for deaths, heart attacks and strokes, according to an independent analysis rushed online Thursday because of public safety concerns.

The drug muraglitazar, developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck & Co. to be sold under the name Pargluva, was endorsed by a Food and Drug Administration panel last month. It is a treatment for Type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the condition that occurs most often in adults who are overweight.

Researchers with the Cleveland Clinic analyzed the data the FDA made public before the panel vote and found that patients taking Pargluva faced double the risk of death, heart attack or stroke, compared with those on dummy pills or a similar drug.

If the analysis is correct, the drug could have meant a "public health catastrophe," said one of the researchers, Dr. Steven Nissen, a prominent heart specialist with Cleveland Clinic.

The analysis was published Thursday morning on the Journal of the American Medical Association's Web site.

The drug's makers said earlier this week that they had received an "approvable" letter from the FDA that also asked for more safety data on the drug's cardiovascular effects.

"It is beyond me why individuals who are supposed to be overseeing the safety of the public would take a chance when it's not necessary," said Dr. Catherine DeAngelis, JAMA's editor in chief. "It's not like there are not other drugs that can be used" for diabetes.

An FDA spokeswoman said agency officials do not comment on pending drug applications. Calls seeking comment from Merck and Bristol-Myers Squibb were not immediately returned.

The non-insulin drug is designed to lower blood sugar levels and increase levels of "good" cholesterol in patients with Type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease, which affects about 18 million Americans.

The analyzed data involved 3,725 patients who were given Pargluva, a similar drug called pioglitazone, or dummy pills in a variety of studies lasting from 24 weeks to 104 weeks.

Deaths, heart attacks or strokes occurred in 35 of the 2,374 Pargluva patients versus nine of 1,351 patients in a combined group on the other drug or dummy pills, the analysis found. Slightly higher risks for mini-strokes and heart failure also were found among Pargluva patients.

DeAngelis said the Cleveland Clinic analysis shows much more study is needed, and she likened the situation to what occurred with Merck's Vioxx. Merck removed the painkiller from the market last year because of evidence linking it with cardiac problems. Critics contend the FDA did not adequately address safety concerns raised about Vioxx.

Co-author Nissen also called for more studies.

"If our analysis is correct, then this could be a public health catastrophe of the magnitude of what we saw with Vioxx," Nissen said. "We had an opportunity in this particular case to stop this from happening before it was ever approved."

Nissen has done consulting work for a number of drug companies, including Merck and makers of other diabetes treatments, but said he does not accept fees for that work.

DeAngelis said JAMA fast-tracks research studies for online publication only once or twice yearly.

"We worked like heck to get this one out," she said.

The advocacy group Public Citizen also has voiced concerns about approving Pargluva because of safety concerns.



 
 


BecomeHealthyNow.com | 519 Cleveland St Suite 115 | Clearwater, FL 33755 | (727) 461-7354 | FAX: (727) 443-6664
For questions regarding this site contact us here. © BecomeHealthyNow.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Site design by Dr. Gary Farr. Information on this site is provided for informational purposes and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease, or prescribing any medication. You should read carefully all product packaging. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, promptly contact your health care provider. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. Copyright and disclaimer 2000-2004, BecomeHealthyNow.com, Inc. All rights reserved. View our privacy statement here.